![]() 11
how the Illuminati have a number of ways that they hide their genealogies,
and one of these is the
common practice of adopting out a child, so that it gets a different last name.
Satanist Bonewitz calls the leading Illuminati families "Fam-Trads."
He spells out that Fam-Trads
mean the very powerful families that have been the actual ones to pass witchcraft down from one
generation to the next. Bonewitzs article clalms that the only coherent lineage of witchcraft was what
these powerful families have given us. They were able to pass down witchcraft uninterrupted
because
they were so powerful. He writes, "There is plenty of evidence of ancient Pagan traditions surviving
under thin Christian veneers in isolated parts of Christendom,
but there is almost nothing
logical to
suggest that the people leading these traditions were in touch with each other..." How did the leading
powerful families continue to practice their witchcraft? Bonewitzs answer is interesting,
He states,
· REVISITING
THE COLLINS FAMILY
Isaac Bonewitz who sits on the llluminatis Grand Druid Council wrote in "Witchcraft"
(which was a
series of articles in the Green Egg in 1976) some very interesting
statements about the top Illuminati
families.
Most members of Fam-Trads made efforts to conceal their "superstitlous"
beliefs and Pagan magical
systems. Instead they became involved
in Freemasonry
and Rosicrucianism
in the 18th century,
Spiritualism
and Theosophy
in the 19th; for all these movements were considered more respectable
than witchcraft, and still allowed the Fam-Trads to practice occult arts ... So as the years went by,
members of the Fam-Trads absorbed more and more from non-pagan magical sources and handed
their new information
down to each generation, often carelessly letting the descendants think that a
Rosicrucian spell or alchemical meditation was a legitimate part of their Pagan heritage. So even
today we have Fam-Trad witches who are far closer to being Theosophists
or Spiritualists than to
being Classical or Neoclassical
witches. (Bonewitz, Isaac. "Witchcraft"
The Green Egg, June 21,
1976, Pt. III pp. 5-6.)
In 1770, Lord Petre, Grand Master in the Masonic Lodges in the British colonies appointed John
Collins to be the Provincial Grand Master of Quebec. (Co-authored
by a board of Masonic editors,
History of the Ancient and Honorable
Fraternity of
Free and Accepted Masons & Concordant
Orders.
Boston & NY: The Fraternity Pub. Co., 1891, p. 225.) I mention John Collins as an example of a
powerful 18th century Freemason, who was part of what appears to be the Collins Illuminati family.
In previous articles, we have documented how the early 18th century Astors and DuPonts were active
Freemasons.
The history of these top families does agree with Bonewitz that in order to continue to
practice their witchcraft they used the cover of Freemasonry.
Later, in the 19th century some of the
leading families can be seen to have moved into Spiritualism,
such as the British royal family, and
Mary Baker Eddy of the Baker famliy. Interestingly,
H.P. Blavatsky who was involved with spiritism
started the Theosophical
Society and also a periodical named
Lucifer in 1887. The woman who co-
edited Lucifer with her was the medium (now called a channeler) Mabel Collins. Mabel Collins later
had a disagreement
with H.P.B. and left. (Oppenheim,
Janet. The Other World. Cambridge,
Eng.:
Cambridge Univ. Press, p.182.) And it is possible that a few of the Rockefellers
joined Lucis Trust
which is an extension of Theosophy a well as members of the Hall family such as Manly P. Hall
whose wife was a Bauer (very likely part of the Rothschild bloodline.) This pattern that Bonewitz has
pointed out to us, is worthy of continued investigation,
it is likely that other leading families have also
followed the pattern he describes. The 13 top Illuminati families are more correctly described as 13
bloodlines. The Collins family had a branch that shot off from it during the early 1800s which was the
Todd family. The Todd family branch remained an important part of the Illuminati. We will now
discuss this branch in more detail as I said I might in the Feb. 1, 93 newsletter.
|